| Peer-Reviewed

Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy

Received: 9 February 2021     Accepted: 19 February 2021     Published: 27 February 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy in terms of safety, postoperative pain and cosmetic effect. Methods: The medical records of 19 patients who underwent hysterectomy with 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Sugery in the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 6 cases in the group of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (5mm) and 13 cases in the group of traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (1.5cm-3cm). Collect and compare the intraoperative blood loss, the operative time, the postoperative hemoglobin descender, the postoperative hospital stays, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, Visual analogue scale (VAS) of 12 hours after surgery, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and postoperative Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ, including Body Image scale, BIS and Cosmetic Score, CS) in the two groups. Results: There was no intraoperative complication happened, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the forms of the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative hemoglobin descender, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and CS (P > 0.05). But the VAS of 12 hours after surgery of the 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy was lower than traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy (1.17±0.14 vs. 2.33±0.19), the BIS of the former was higher than the later (19.83±0.15 vs 19.16±0.28), and importantly the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site through 5mm mini-incision is safe and feasible. Compared with traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy through ordinary incision, it can not only significantly reduce postoperative pain, but also bring more satisfactory postoperative cosmetic effect.

Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15
Page(s) 21-25
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

5mm Mini-incision, Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery, Hysterectomy

References
[1] Huang, L., et al., Comparative analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in ovarian cystectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2021. 47 (2): p. 757-764.
[2] Ma, J., et al., The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Benign Gynecological Diseases. J Invest Surg, 2021: p. 1-8.
[3] Misal, M., P. M. Magtibay and J. Yi, Robotic LESS and Reduced-Port Hysterectomy Using the da Vinci SP Surgical System: A Single-Institution Case Series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020.
[4] Wang, Q., et al., Stepwise Laparoendoscopic Single-site Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020.
[5] Zhu, C., et al., Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Male Patients with Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2021. 31 (1): p. 90-94.
[6] Sangnier, E., et al., Single port laparoscopy (SPL): Retrospective study evaluating postoperative pain in comparison with conventional laparoscopy (CL). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2018. 47 (8): p. 365-369.
[7] Michener, C. M., et al., Meta-analysis of Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Multiport Hysterectomy: Real Benefits or Diminishing Returns? J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020.
[8] Dunker, M. S., et al., Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc, 1998. 12 (11): p. 1334-40.
[9] Marchand, G. J., et al., Single Port 11 mm Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed on a 32-Year-Old Female with Adhesive Disease. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2020. 2020 (1-4): p. 3757391.
[10] Wei, Y., et al., Laparoendoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): stepwise transition from multi-site to single-site with the aid of the transurethral port. Int Urol Nephrol, 2021. 53 (2): p. 249-255.
[11] Tsai, K. Y., et al., Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy on anterolateral liver segments. Surg Endosc, 2020. 34 (7): p. 2969-2979.
[12] Zaccaria, L., et al., Long-Term Follow-Up of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Partial Nephrectomy for Nonfunctioning Moieties of Renal Duplication and Fusion Anomalies in Infants and Children. J Endourol, 2020. 34 (2): p. 134-138.
[13] Demirayak, G., et al., Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2020. 40 (2): p. 217-221.
[14] Chen, W., et al., Comparison of Cosmetic Effect and Pain Reduction Outcomes of Modified Mini-Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Adrenalectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019. 29 (12): p. 1544-1548.
[15] Song, T., et al., Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013. 20 (4): p. 460-7.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ying Cao, Yilin Sun, Jiming Chen, Zhiyong Dong, Yafeng Zheng, et al. (2021). Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ying Cao; Yilin Sun; Jiming Chen; Zhiyong Dong; Yafeng Zheng, et al. Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 9(1), 21-25. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ying Cao, Yilin Sun, Jiming Chen, Zhiyong Dong, Yafeng Zheng, et al. Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy. J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;9(1):21-25. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15,
      author = {Ying Cao and Yilin Sun and Jiming Chen and Zhiyong Dong and Yafeng Zheng and Yunfen Jiang and Ruxia Shi},
      title = {Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy},
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {21-25},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20210901.15},
      abstract = {Objective: To investigate the feasibility of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy in terms of safety, postoperative pain and cosmetic effect. Methods: The medical records of 19 patients who underwent hysterectomy with 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Sugery in the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 6 cases in the group of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (5mm) and 13 cases in the group of traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (1.5cm-3cm). Collect and compare the intraoperative blood loss, the operative time, the postoperative hemoglobin descender, the postoperative hospital stays, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, Visual analogue scale (VAS) of 12 hours after surgery, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and postoperative Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ, including Body Image scale, BIS and Cosmetic Score, CS) in the two groups. Results: There was no intraoperative complication happened, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the forms of the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative hemoglobin descender, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and CS (P > 0.05). But the VAS of 12 hours after surgery of the 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy was lower than traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy (1.17±0.14 vs. 2.33±0.19), the BIS of the former was higher than the later (19.83±0.15 vs 19.16±0.28), and importantly the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site through 5mm mini-incision is safe and feasible. Compared with traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy through ordinary incision, it can not only significantly reduce postoperative pain, but also bring more satisfactory postoperative cosmetic effect.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Clinical Comparison of 5mm Mini-incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy and Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy
    AU  - Ying Cao
    AU  - Yilin Sun
    AU  - Jiming Chen
    AU  - Zhiyong Dong
    AU  - Yafeng Zheng
    AU  - Yunfen Jiang
    AU  - Ruxia Shi
    Y1  - 2021/02/27
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 21
    EP  - 25
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210901.15
    AB  - Objective: To investigate the feasibility of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy in terms of safety, postoperative pain and cosmetic effect. Methods: The medical records of 19 patients who underwent hysterectomy with 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Sugery in the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 6 cases in the group of 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (5mm) and 13 cases in the group of traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy through umbilical ordinary incision (1.5cm-3cm). Collect and compare the intraoperative blood loss, the operative time, the postoperative hemoglobin descender, the postoperative hospital stays, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, Visual analogue scale (VAS) of 12 hours after surgery, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and postoperative Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ, including Body Image scale, BIS and Cosmetic Score, CS) in the two groups. Results: There was no intraoperative complication happened, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the forms of the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative hemoglobin descender, the probability of postoperative wound infection, the total cost, VAS of 24 hours after surgery and CS (P > 0.05). But the VAS of 12 hours after surgery of the 5mm mini-•incision Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy was lower than traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site hysterectomy (1.17±0.14 vs. 2.33±0.19), the BIS of the former was higher than the later (19.83±0.15 vs 19.16±0.28), and importantly the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site through 5mm mini-incision is safe and feasible. Compared with traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy through ordinary incision, it can not only significantly reduce postoperative pain, but also bring more satisfactory postoperative cosmetic effect.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China

  • Sections